Investing Rulebook

Pre-Depreciation Profit

The Definition and Importance of Pre-Depreciation ProfitHave you ever wondered how companies determine their profitability? You might think that looking at their financial statements would provide all the answers, but it’s not as straightforward as it seems.

One crucial aspect that often gets overlooked is pre-depreciation profit. In this article, we will explore the definition and importance of pre-depreciation profit, how it is calculated, and why it matters for businesses.

1. Definition and Calculation of Pre-Depreciation Profit:

1.1 Definition:

Pre-depreciation profit refers to the profit a company generates before accounting for depreciation expenses.

Unlike other expenses, such as rent or salaries, depreciation is a non-cash expense. It represents the decrease in value of tangible assets, such as buildings and equipment, over time.

By excluding depreciation from the profit calculation, companies can have a clearer picture of their operational performance. 1.2 Calculation:

To calculate pre-depreciation profit, we start with the net income on the income statement.

Then, we add back the depreciation expense. This gives us a figure that reflects the profit before accounting for the impact of depreciation.

The formula for pre-depreciation profit can be expressed as follows:

Pre-Depreciation Profit = Net Income + Depreciation Expense

Note that the depreciation expense can be found in the non-cash expenses section of the income statement. 2.

Importance and Use of Pre-Depreciation Profit:

2.1 Debt Service:

One of the primary uses of pre-depreciation profit is to assess a company’s ability to service its debt. Lenders and investors often look at this figure to determine if a business can generate enough cash flow to meet its financial obligations.

By excluding non-cash expenses, such as depreciation, pre-depreciation profit provides a more accurate measure of a company’s ability to generate cash. 2.2 Cleaner Number:

Pre-depreciation profit is often considered a cleaner number than the net income when evaluating a company’s financial health.

Since depreciation is a non-cash expense, excluding it from the profit calculation gives a clearer indication of a company’s profitability. This is especially important when comparing companies in different industries or with significant differences in asset composition.

2.3 Actual Cash Flow:

Another reason pre-depreciation profit is essential is that it reflects the actual cash flow generated by a company’s operations. While net income includes non-cash expenses like depreciation, pre-depreciation profit focuses solely on the cash generated from the business operations.

This metric is crucial for companies that rely on consistent and significant cash flow to fund their day-to-day activities. 2.4 Profitability Measure:

Pre-depreciation profit can also help assess a company’s profitability.

By comparing pre-depreciation profit with revenue, we can calculate the pre-depreciation profit margin, which reflects the percentage of revenue that is retained as pre-depreciation profit. This metric can be used to compare profitability across different companies or track profitability trends for a single company over time.

Depreciation and Its Impact on Profit:

1. Depreciation Methods and Calculation:

1.1 Depreciation Methods:

There are several methods companies can use to calculate depreciation.

The most common methods are the declining balance method and the straight-line method. The declining balance method, such as double-declining balance, allocates a higher depreciation expense in the early years of an asset’s life and lower amounts in later years.

On the other hand, the straight-line method allocates an equal amount of depreciation expense over the asset’s useful life. 1.2 Calculation:

To calculate depreciation, a company needs to determine the useful life of an asset and its salvage value.

The useful life represents the estimated number of years the company expects to use the asset, while the salvage value is the estimated value of the asset at the end of its useful life. By subtracting the salvage value from the initial cost of the asset and dividing it by the useful life, we can determine the annual depreciation expense.

2. Relationship between Depreciation and Profit:

2.1 Gross Profit:

Depreciation directly impacts the gross profit of a company.

Since depreciation is considered an indirect expense, it is deducted from the total revenue to calculate the gross profit. The gross profit represents the revenue remaining after deducting the direct costs associated with producing goods or services.

2.2 Indirect Expenses:

Depreciation is classified as an indirect expense in the income statement. It accounts for expenses that are not directly related to the production process but are necessary for running the business.

By allocating a portion of the asset’s cost over its useful life, depreciation helps reflect the wear and tear on the company’s assets. 2.3 Tax Benefits:

While depreciation reduces profit, it provides tax benefits for businesses.

In many jurisdictions, companies can deduct depreciation expenses from their taxable income, thereby lowering their tax liability. This deduction helps reduce the overall tax burden and improves cash flow.

2.4 Taxable Income:

Depreciation has an indirect impact on a company’s taxable income. As the depreciation expense reduces profit, the taxable income is also reduced.

This results in a lower tax liability for the company. Conclusion:

By understanding the concept of pre-depreciation profit and its significance, businesses can make more informed decisions regarding their operations, financial health, and profitability.

Pre-depreciation profit provides a cleaner measure of a company’s cash generation potential, allowing for better analysis of its ability to service debt, generate cash flow, and measure profitability. Additionally, understanding how depreciation impacts profit helps companies accurately evaluate their financial performance and take advantage of tax benefits.

So the next time you analyze a company’s financial statements, don’t forget to consider pre-depreciation profit and its impact on profitability.

Comparison with EBITDA

3. Definition and Calculation of EBITDA:

3.1 Definition:

In addition to pre-depreciation profit, another commonly used financial metric is EBITDA, which stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.

EBITDA provides a measure of a company’s operating performance by excluding non-operating expenses, such as interest, taxes, and non-cash expenses like depreciation and amortization. It is often used to assess the profitability and cash generation potential of a business.

3.2 Calculation:

EBITDA is calculated by starting with the operating profit from the income statement and adding back interest expenses, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. The formula for EBITDA can be expressed as follows:

EBITDA = Operating Profit + Interest Expenses + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization

Operating profit represents the profit generated from a company’s core business activities before interest, taxes, and non-operating expenses are deducted.

By further excluding depreciation and amortization, EBITDA provides a clearer view of a company’s operating performance. Differences between Pre-Depreciation Profit and EBITDA:

While both pre-depreciation profit and EBITDA aim to provide a clearer measure of a company’s operational performance, they differ in certain aspects.

4.1 Non-Cash Charges vs. Actual Cash Charges:

One key difference lies in the treatment of non-cash charges.

Pre-depreciation profit focuses on excluding depreciation, which is a significant non-cash charge. It removes the impact of tangible asset depreciation on profitability, allowing for a more accurate measure of operating performance.

On the other hand, EBITDA also excludes amortization, another non-cash charge related to intangible assets. By excluding both depreciation and amortization, EBITDA provides an even cleaner measure of the operating profit generated by a company’s core business activities.

4.2 Cost of Capital Investments:

Another difference between pre-depreciation profit and EBITDA is the consideration of capital investments. Pre-depreciation profit only focuses on the impact of depreciation expenses, which are associated with tangible asset investments.

It does not account for the cost of acquiring or maintaining those assets. In contrast, EBITDA includes depreciation and amortization to provide a more comprehensive view of the capital investments made by a company.

Depreciation Methods and Financial Statements:

4. Calculation Methods for Depreciation:

4.1 Straight-Line Method:

The straight-line method is the most commonly used depreciation method.

It evenly allocates the cost of an asset over its useful life. To calculate depreciation using the straight-line method, you need to know the initial cost of the asset, its useful life, and any estimated salvage value.

The formula is relatively simple:

Depreciation Expense = (Initial Cost – Salvage Value) / Useful Life

4.2 Declining Balance Method:

The declining balance method allocates a higher depreciation expense in the early years of an asset’s life and lower amounts in later years. This method reflects the idea that an asset is more productive and has higher wear and tear in its early years.

The declining balance method can be calculated using a fixed rate of depreciation, such as double-declining balance, or a variable rate set by the company. 4.2 Presentation of Depreciation on Financial Statements:

Depreciation expense affects both the income statement and the balance sheet.

On the income statement, depreciation is classified as an expense and is deducted from revenue to calculate the operating profit. It reflects the wear and tear on assets used in the production process and indirectly impacts the profitability of a company.

By deducting the depreciation expense, the income statement provides a more accurate representation of the company’s operational performance. On the balance sheet, depreciation is reflected in the accumulated depreciation account, which is subtracted from the asset’s carrying value.

This account shows the total amount of depreciation accumulated over the useful life of the asset. The net carrying value of the asset is then reported on the balance sheet, providing insight into the current value of the asset.


In conclusion, pre-depreciation profit and EBITDA are both valuable metrics used to assess a company’s operational performance. While pre-depreciation profit excludes depreciation to provide a clearer measure of operating profit, EBITDA takes it a step further by also excluding amortization.

Both metrics help investors and stakeholders evaluate the profitability and cash generation potential of a business by considering its operational performance and capital investments. Understanding the different depreciation methods and how they are presented on financial statements will further enhance one’s ability to interpret a company’s financial health.

So, whether you are comparing companies, assessing investment opportunities, or analyzing your own business, these concepts will provide valuable insights into the numbers behind the success. EBITDA vs.


5. Definition and Calculation of EBITDAR:

5.1 Definition:

In addition to EBITDA, another variation of this financial metric is EBITDAR, which stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization, and Restructuring/Rental costs.

While EBITDA provides a measure of a company’s operating performance by excluding non-operating expenses like depreciation and amortization, EBITDAR takes it a step further by also excluding restructuring costs and rental expenses. This metric is particularly relevant for industries such as restaurants and casinos, where restructuring costs may be substantial, and rental expenses are significant.

5.2 Calculation:

To calculate EBITDAR, we start with the EBITDA figure and add back restructuring expenses and rental costs. The formula for EBITDAR can be expressed as follows:

EBITDAR = EBITDA + Restructuring Expenses + Rental Costs

Restructuring expenses refer to the costs associated with significant changes in a company’s operations, such as layoffs, rebranding, or closures.

Rental costs include expenses related to leasing or renting properties essential for the company’s operations. Application and Differences Between EBITDA and EBITDAR:

EBITDAR is particularly useful in certain industries where restructuring costs and rental expenses significantly impact profitability.

Here are a few instances where EBITDAR provides a unique perspective:

– Restaurants: Many restaurants undergo periodic changes in their operations, such as revamping menus, upgrading interiors, or rebranding. These restructuring costs can be substantial and impact the profitability of the business.

By excluding these expenses, EBITDAR provides a better measure of a restaurant’s operating performance, making it easier for investors and stakeholders to evaluate its financial health. – Casinos: The casino industry often incurs significant restructuring costs due to ongoing renovations, changes in gaming options, or entertainment offerings.

These expenses can be substantial and have a direct impact on the profitability of the casino. By evaluating EBITDAR, investors and stakeholders can assess the operational performance of the casino without the influence of these unique costs.

– Companies undergoing recent restructuring: Businesses that have recently undergone restructuring, such as mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures, typically incur one-time expenses related to these activities. These expenses can significantly impact the company’s financial statements and mask its true operating performance.

By excluding restructuring costs, EBITDAR provides a clearer picture of the company’s ongoing operations and its ability to generate profits. – Rental-dependent industries: Industries that heavily rely on rental expenses, such as airlines, may find EBITDAR particularly useful.

Rental costs for aircraft, gates, and other facilities play a vital role in the operations of airlines. Excluding these expenses allows stakeholders to assess the company’s profitability based on its core services, rather than the impact of rental obligations.

The key difference between EBITDA and EBITDAR lies in the inclusion of restructuring expenses and rental costs. While EBITDA focuses on the operating performance of a company by excluding non-operating expenses like depreciation and amortization, EBITDAR extends this exclusion to restructuring costs and rental expenses.

By removing these additional costs, EBITDAR provides a more accurate measure of a company’s ability to generate profits from its core operations. Conclusion:

EBITDA and EBITDAR are financial metrics that help evaluate a company’s operating performance by excluding non-operating expenses.

While EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization expenses, EBITDAR goes a step further by also excluding restructuring costs and rental expenses. EBITDAR is particularly useful in industries where these additional costs significantly impact profitability, such as restaurants, casinos, and rental-dependent sectors.

By looking at EBITDAR, investors and stakeholders can gain a clearer understanding of a company’s operational performance, allowing for more informed decision-making. Whether assessing a company’s ability to generate cash flow, comparing profitability across industries, or analyzing recent restructuring efforts, both EBITDA and EBITDAR provide valuable insights into a company’s financial health.

Popular Posts